Legal Opinion

Richerson v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1967No. 9751PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

This appeal presents for resolution the question whether following request for a speedy trial by an accused, the refusal of the State to initiate procedures under 18 U.S.C.A. § 4085 for return of the accused, who is an inmate in a federal correction institution, to this state for trial on a criminal charge deprives such accused of his right to a speedy trial guaranteed by U.S. Const. Amend. 6, cl. 1, and also by Idaho Const. Art. 1, § 13.

Appellant Richerson, on June 29, 1965, submitted to the District Court for Canyon County, his motion entitled “Motion for a Speedy Trial or…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  5. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pope v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. HoltslanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. LindsayIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. TalmageIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API