Legal Opinion

State v. Maples

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2018No. WD 79955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Detective Bearden also testified in Maples's offer of proof. He had interviewed Timothy after the murder. Timothy had denied ever being at Belinda's home or the farm prior to the murder. Detective Bearden also interviewed Chastain. Chastain told Detective Bearden that Timothy had made the following statement to her on January of 2014: "The kid didn't know what he was walking into." Chastain said she did not know who Timothy was referring to when he made that statement. Chastain also said that Timothy made the following statement: "I don't deserve to be alive. I killed her." Chastain again…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. State v. SchaalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State of Missouri v. Destynie J. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API