State v. Schaal
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
At issue in this case is the constitutionality of Section 492.304, RSMo 1986, which permits the trial court to admit into evidence a statement of a child victim of specified crimes. Convicted of rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 1986, appellant Schaal claims that Section 492.304 is facially unconstitutional in that it violates his rights to confrontation and due process as guaranteed under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United *661States Constitution and Article I, sections 10 and 18(a) of the Missouri Constitution. In addition, Schaal contends that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.