State v. Knizek

Defendant was convicted by a jury upon an information charging him with the crime of burglary in the second degree. Motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial were denied, and judgment of conviction and sentence was entered, from which this appeal was taken.

Under his several assignments of error, appellant contends that the court erred in two respects: (1) In

permitting the state to amend the .information after all the evidence was in, and (2) in denying appellant’s motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

The information charged:

“That he, the said defendant, H. R. Knizek, in…