Legal Opinion
Milner v. Bolger
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 26, 1982No. Civ. S-81-315 RARPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAMIREZ, District Judge.
The motion of defendant to strike plaintiff’s prayer for interest on any judgment she may hereinafter recover came on regularly for hearing before the Honorable Raul A. Ramirez on May 10, 1982. Defendant and moving party, WILLIAM F. BOLGER, was represented by Yoshinori H.T. Himel, Assistant United States Attorney, and Larry B. Anderson, Esq., of the United States Postal Service. Plaintiff and responding party, BLANCHE MILNER, was represented by Rolleen Mcllwrath, Esq. Having considered the memoranda of points and authorities and having considered…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wickwire Gavin, P.C. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Cross v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Joan Carol Nagy v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Federal Express Corp. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.