Legal Opinion

Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION No. 13-6158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Juan R. Sánchez, District Judge.

Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc. (S & N) asks this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs Walter and Vivian Shuker’s Third Amended Complaint asserting state-law claims for negligence, fraud, and loss of consortium arising out of S & N’s alleged “off-label” promotion of an artificial hip component used in Mr. Shuker’s hip replacement surgery.1 In a prior opinion, this Court concluded that because the component in question—the R3 metal liner—was part of a device that the FDA had authorized S & N to market pursuant to the agency’s rigorous premarket approval process,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API