Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Juan R. Sánchez, District Judge.
Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc. (S & N) asks this Court to dismiss Plaintiffs Walter and Vivian Shuker’s Third Amended Complaint asserting state-law claims for negligence, fraud, and loss of consortium arising out of S & N’s alleged “off-label” promotion of an artificial hip component used in Mr. Shuker’s hip replacement surgery.1 In a prior opinion, this Court concluded that because the component in question—the R3 metal liner—was part of a device that the FDA had authorized S & N to market pursuant to the agency’s rigorous premarket approval process,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walter Shuker v. Smith & Nephew PLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018