Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Brach

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2002No. C037369PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Defendants Anne Marie Brach and William Sanford Gardner pleaded guilty to cultivating marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) 1 and possession of marijuana for sale (§ 11359). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence, placed defendants on probation, and ordered them to serve local jail terms.

At issue on appeal are conditions of probation requiring defendants to reimburse the Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Department for expenses incurred in the eradication of defendants’ marijuana. Defendants claim the People and the trial court failed to comply with sections…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. United States v. Jerry D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. WilenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API