Legal Opinion
Baker v. PROPERTY INVESTORS OF CONNECTICUT
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 21, 2004No. Civ. 3:02 CV 1839 AHNPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING
NEVAS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Shaheerah Baker and ten other residents of New Era Court, a low-income housing development project in Bridgeport, Connecticut, have brought suit against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and then-Secretary Mel Martinez (collectively, “HUD”), the Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport (“HACB”), Francisco & Associates, Clara Stevens, Property Investors of Connecticut (“PIC”), T & D Properties of Bridgeport Corp. (“T & D”),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- St. Pierre v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- NB v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Fort Peck Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
- Harris v. BLUERAY TECHNOLOGIES SHAREHOLDERS, INC.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2009
- Nb v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011