Legal Opinion
Fort Peck Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 30, 2006No. CIVAO5CV00018RPMCBSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATSCH, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff, Fort Peck Housing Authority (“FPHA”), is an agency of the federally recognized Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation. FPHA is authorized as a Tribally Designated Housing Entity (“TDHE”) to receive annual block grant funds from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996, 25 U.S.C. § 4101 et seq. (“NAHASDA”), and administer those funds to provide affordable housing for low income…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ramah Navajo Chapter v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Serena Dewakuku v. Mel R. Martinez, Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Baker v. PROPERTY INVESTORS OF CONNECTICUTDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians of Oklahoma v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Yakama Nation Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Lummi Nation Housing Authority, Fort Berthold Housing Authority, and Hopi Tribal Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.