Newell v. Rent Board of Peabody
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiffs challenge the validity of an ordinance of the city of Peabody, regulating mobile home park rents and evictions, enacted pursuant to authority purportedly granted by a special act of the Legislature. St. 1976, c. 131. They filed a complaint seeking a declaration that the ordinance is unconstitutional because the special act was not properly enacted pursuant to the Home Rule Amendment (art. 2 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth as amended by art. 89 of those Amendments). They also contended that the special act denies them due process of law because it was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pinnick v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. Henry's Drywall Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grace v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Hampshire Village Associates v. District Court of HampshireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Civitarese v. Town of MiddleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Quinn v. Rent Control BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Loeterman v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.