Legal Opinion

Pitt Lumber Co. v. Askew

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

Plaintiff and defendant, eacb being indebted to the other, were unable to adjust their accounts by reason of a misunderstanding as' to two items, to wit, a loading machine and a crankshaft; hence, this suit to adjust the differences. Plaintiff contends that it sold to the defendant the loading machine in question for $150, and took from him as part payment thereon a crankshaft valued at $65. the defendant contends that the. loading machine, by agreement, was exchanged for bis crankshaft, and that nothing further was to be paid by him to the plaintiff on account of this trade. The jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. PeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Miles v. AndrewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. A. T. Griffin Manufacturing Co. v. BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Sanders v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Powers v. . Commercial Service Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API