Legal Opinion

Miles v. Andrews

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. Nathaniel W. Green, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

This was an action of assumpsit, by appellants, against appellees, upon three promissory notes. The declaration contained three special counts, each describing one of the notes in suit, and also the common counts. The defendants filed two special pleas: First, that the notes were given without any good or valuable consideration ; and second, that the sole and only consideration upon which they were executed was for money won by plaintiffs from defendant Robert B. Andrews in a certain speculation on the market price of grain, and defendant Wells Andrews signed the notes as surety. On the trial…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. PowloskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McCarthy v. PeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Palermo v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Kent v. CobbColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Hancock v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API