Legal Opinion

A. T. Griffin Manufacturing Co. v. Bray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 16, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

"What is the law with respect to the admissibility and competency of telephone conversations?

The question of law raised by the record is based upon the following excerpt from the record:

“In regard to the telephone conversation with Hancock & Davis about some of this material, go ahead and state what happened?”

(A). “I had a phone call, and a gentleman that said it was Mr. Davis, and whose voice I had no right to doubt, said to ship him” — the defendants, Hancock and Davis objected on the ground that the witness had not qualified as being familiar with Mr. Davis’ voice, whereupon the witness,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. Robertson'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Noland Co. v. . TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Warner v. . HalyburtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Sanders v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Everette v. DO BRIGGS LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Carolina Builders Corp. v. AAA Dry Wall, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API