Legal Opinion
Holland v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 8, 2000No. CIV. A. 00-1131PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Defendant William H. Pearson moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), or in the alternative, to transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. 28 U.S.C. § 1631. In addition, defendant Consolidated Freightways Corporation moves to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. 28 U.S.C. § 1404. Defendants together move to. strike paragraphs 26 and 27 of the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). Subject matter jurisdiction is diversity. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen MichaelsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Vetrotex Certainteed Corporation v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kershner v. Komatsu Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018