Legal Opinion
Vetrotex Certainteed Corporation v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 26, 1996No. 94-2058PublishedCited by 277 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Vetrotex CertainTeed Corporation (“Vetrotex”), a Pennsylvania corporation, brought suit in the federal district court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against defendant-appellee Consolidated Fiber Glass Products Company (“Conglas”), a California corporation. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the district court properly dismissed the complaint of Vetrotex for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because it is not contested that general jurisdiction does not lie, and because we find that Conglas has not purposefully…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by277 opinions
- Miller Yacht Sales, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Lloyd Z. Remick, Esq. v. Angel Manfredy John Manfredy Jeffrey H. Brown, Esq. Kathleen H. Klaus, Esq. D'AnconA & PflaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Hyatt International Corp. v. Gerardo CocoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Robert Felland v. Patrick CliftonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
272 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.