Legal Opinion
Kershner v. Komatsu Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 10, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17–4787PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRufe, District Judge
Plaintiff Matthew Kershner brings this action against Defendants Komatsu Ltd. and related entities1 alleging he suffered serious injuries in an accident involving a Komatsu bulldozer. Defendants filed a motion to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.2 For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion to transfer.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are uncontested. In 2015, Plaintiff was working as a bulldozer operator for Double Eagle Energy Services, LLC on a pipeline project that covered parts of Southeastern Ohio,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Corey Byrne, et al. v. Terex USA, LLC d/b/a Marco, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- DUNKIN v. D.F. CHASE, INC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- DUNKIN v. D.F. CHASE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- KRUZEL v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- RILEY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019