Legal Opinion
State v. Neesley
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided June 8, 2006No. 01-05-00558-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
The State charged appellee, Nancy N. Neesley, with intoxication manslaughter. Appellee filed a motion to suppress contending that a second specimen of appel-lee’s blood was taken in violation of her statutory and constitutional guarantees under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, article 1 section 9 of the Texas constitution, chapters 14 and 15 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and chapter 724 of the Texas Transportation Code. The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress the second blood specimen under chapter 724…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Hailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NeesleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. PowellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- State of Texas v. Neesley, Nancy N.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State of Texas v. Powell, Robert LeahyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- State of Texas v. Powell, Robert LeahyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.