Legal Opinion

State v. Neesley

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 2007No. PD-1396-06PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.

in which MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

This case addresses the questions of how the term “specimen” should be interpreted in the context of § 724.012(b) of the Texas Transportation Code and how many specimens the statute permits to be taken. We hold that specimen should be construed to mean a usable sample, and that one and only one specimen (as so defined) may be taken. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

THE FACTS AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE

On July 26,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. State v. Neesley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

4Cited by87 opinions

  1. Linton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Mahaffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Lang, Terri ReginaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Phillips, Christopher AllenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API