Legal Opinion

In Re Unger

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 1908No. 219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application of U. W. Unger for a writ of habeas corpus.'

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On May 28, 1908, petitioner filed in this court an original application for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging himself to be illegally restrained of his liberty by C. D. Spencer, city marshall of the city of Chandler, for the nonpayment of a certain fine and costs assessed against him in the police court, of said city for the alleged violation of an ordinance thereof which said ordinance he claim's is void. The return to the writ shows petitioner to be in the custody of said Spencer, as city marshal of said city, by virtue of an alias commitment from said court directing respondent to confine…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Brown v. German-American Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Emmons v. City of LewistownIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. In Re GribbenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Kiel v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Licensing Board for General Contractors v. LaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. McGuire v. WilkersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Ex Parte WestellisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Standard Accident Insurance v. BasoloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API