Brown v. German-American Title & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 168, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Dee. T., 1893, No. 31, for defendant non obstante veredicto. Assumpsit for wages. The facts appear by the opinion of the court below, Eni>lich, J., which was as follows : The peculiar importance of this case consists in the fact that there are about a hundred others pending which will be controlled by the principles decisive of this.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 168, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Dee. T., 1893, No. 31, for defendant non obstante veredicto. Assumpsit for wages. The facts appear by the opinion of the court below, Eni>lich, J., which was as follows : The peculiar importance of this case consists in the fact that there are about a hundred others pending which will be controlled by the principles decisive of this. At the conclusion of the testimony upon the trial, there being no facts whatever in dispute, a verdict was, by agreement of counsel, directed for plaintiff subject to the opinion of…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjeiam,
We are entirely satisfied with the conclusions reached by the learned court below. The very able and exhaustive opinion filed vindicates the correctness of the decision and we affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons there stated.
2Cited by20 opinions
- Pennsylvania Federation of Teachers v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. KirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Smiler v. TollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- State v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- In Re UngerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.