Legal Opinion

Tartaglia v. Paine Webber, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 3, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

794 A.2d 816 (2002)

350 N.J. Super. 142

Maria TARTAGLIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PAINE WEBBER, INC. and Herb Janick, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 27, 2001.

Decided April 3, 2002.

Bennet D. Zurofsky, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Reitman Parsonnet, attorneys; Mr. Zurofsky, on the brief).

Robert H. Bernstein, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Epstein Becker & Green, attorneys; Mr. Bernstein, of counsel; Donald S. Barth, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, EICHEN and LINTNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. CartySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. State of New Jersey v. Kason D. HockettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  3. Quinlan v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  4. State v. LashleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Joye v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API