Legal Opinion

Spradling v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailor

Willie Brown and Arthur Parr were killed while riding in the automobile of Spradling, who was their employer in a logging* or lumber operation in Blount County. Spradling had automobile liability insurance and he also had workmen’s compensation insurance. The former insurance was in the Tennessee Automobile Insurance Company, a Tennessee corporation, and the workmen’s compensation insurance in the Bituminous Casualty Corporation, a foreign corporation. The real question presented is — which of these two companies should pay the claims against 'Spradling for the deaths of these two employees,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Wirta v. North Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McClain v. Kingsport Improvement Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Barrentine v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  2. Tallent v. M. C. Lyle & SonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Taylor v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ward v. WardTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Knox v. BatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API