Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Meeks

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

■ This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the employer has appealed from an award against him in favor of an employee.

There is little if any dispute as to the facts. The plaintiff, Dillard Taylor, sustained an injury to his right eye while riding in a truck of his employer, Mitchell Meeks. According to the undisputed evidence Meeks operated a *697saw mill about ten (10) miles from Ms borne and regularly carried bis employees back and forth in bis truck. On the day of Taylor’s injury these employees were riding home from the mill. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kingsport Silk Mills v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Moore v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Free v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. DossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. American Hardware Mutual Insurance v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Insurance Company of America v. HogsettTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Pest Masters, Inc. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Larry M. Duncan v. The City of Oneida, Tennessee, and Mack BurchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API