Legal Opinion
Heredia v. Sandler
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 1993No. 92A05-9205-CV-154PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTEAU, Judge.
Arthur and Peggy Heredia sought return of the earnest money given in connection with an offer to purchase the home of Neil and Carol Sandler. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Heredias and ordered the $1,000 earnest money to be returned to them. However, the court vacated this order on Sandlers’ Motion to Correct Error. Heredias appeal, arguing that summary judgment was properly granted in their favor.
We affirm, holding that material issues of fact remain, making summary judgment inappropriate.
FACTS
Sandlers listed their home for sale with Roth & Wehrly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bicknell Minerals, Inc. v. TillyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jackson v. DeFabisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hammes v. FrankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- City of Evansville v. Old State Utility Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kitchen Jewels, Inc. v. BeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- J.S. Sweet Company, Incorporated v. Sika Chemical Corporation, Also Known as Sika CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Mayflower Transit, Inc. v. Ann Arbor Warehouse Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
- Indiana Hi-Rail Corp. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. Amax Coal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.