Legal Opinion
Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Whiteman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 2001No. 49A02-9910-CV-719PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., (“Time Warner”), appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to correct error filed by Kelly Whiteman and Jean Wilson (collectively “the Plaintiffs”) in their consolidated action against Time Warner.
We affirm in part and reverse in part.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court erred in granting the Plaintiffs’ motion to correct error.
FACTS
The facts are undisputed. Time Warner provides cable services to subscribers in Indianapolis. Subscribers are billed monthly, in advance. Time Warner charges a $4.65 late fee if its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Shell Oil Co. v. Lovold Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Warner Trucking, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Doe v. Shults-Lewis Child & Family Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Ltd. PartnershipWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Oxford Financial Group, Ltd. v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lawson v. First Union Mortgage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.