Franklin v. Georgia Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The bill in this case is filed under section 8377 of the Code to compel the insurance carrier, Georgia Casualty Company, to pay the judgment recovered by the complainant against Lorry, Moore, the- “additional assured.”
The damages recovered by the complainant in the action at law were for the loss of services on account of bodily injury to his minor son, and medical expenses incurred in treating said injuries caused through the negligence of Moore, the assured, in the operation of an automobile covered by the policy of insurance. By the terms of the policy the respondent casualty company, for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- McDonald v. Mobile Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Hey v. PrimeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- In Re Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Burstein v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- American Motorists Insurance v. KopkaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WerfelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.