Legal Opinion

Corinn James And Ian James v. Casey Mcmurry

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 2016No. 47495-6-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, C.J.

¶1 Corinn and Ian James appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against Casey McMurry and his wife (McMurry) on grounds that they failed to comply with the requirements of RCW 46.64.040, the statute allowing for service on a motorist defendant via the secretary of state. They argue that the trial court erred by ruling that RCW 46.64.040 required them to file an affidavit of compliance. McMurry disagrees and also argues that the dismissal was warranted because the Jameses failed to mail proper notice of the alternative service to his last known address and failed to attempt…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. Lemon v. LanglieWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Washington v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ivonne Campbell v. Ana FernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. Gilbert Miller Testamentary Credit Shelter Trust v. Estate Of Mary E MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API