Legal Opinion

California Joint Stock Land Bank v. Gore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The defendants, W. H. Gore and Sophenia J. Ish Gore, are husband and wife and together they owned and operated a farm in Jackson county, each individually holding title to a different portion thereof in severalty. On May 2, 1927, they borrowed from plaintiff the sum of $66,000, and jointly executed two promissory notes, each for the sum of $33,000. To secure the payment thereof, they jointly executed two mortgages, giving, as security for the payment of one of said notes, that part of the land held by W. H. Gore and, as security for the other, that part held by Mrs. Gore. They failed to pay…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  5. Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carondelet Savings & Loan Assn. v. BoyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. BidingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API