Legal Opinion

Schorner v. Schorner

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard F. McCaffrey, J.

At the outset, the court notes that until such time as the Legislature acts to bring into the twentieth century the amount of compensation the court may award for services rendered by referees appointed to sell real property pursuant to a judgment in a mortgage foreclosure or partition action, the court has no alternative but to limit such awards to the unrealistic statutory amounts of $200 in foreclosure actions and $500 in partition actions.

*416The case at bar involves the application of a statute, a portion of which has not been substantially changed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Page Airways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Tucker V. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Chisholm v. HopsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Scher v. AptAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Miraldi v. MiraldiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McVicker v. SarmaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Green v. CurbeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Hufnagle v. BrunsNew York Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API