Chisholm v. Hopson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Caroline Maync, individually and as executrix, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 14th day of February, 1918, granting additional compensation to the referee in a foreclosure action.
1Opinion of the Court
Shearn, J.:
This is an appeal from an order granting a referee on a sale in a foreclosure action $50 additional compensation under the discretionary provision of section 3297 of the' Code, the property having sold for $19,000. There is absolutely no showing whatever of any unusual services rendered by the referee. The sale was advertised for November 14, 1917, and at the request of plaintiffs’ attorneys the referee caused the sale to be postponed until November twenty-eighth, and arranged for the usual publication of the notice of postponement. On November twenty-eighth, at the request of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Marion Mortgage Co. v. MoormanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Railroad Co-Operative Building & Loan Ass'n v. CauteroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Schorner v. SchornerNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- East River Savings Bank v. SteingartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.