Legal Opinion
Hufnagle v. Bruns
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
*363OPINION OF THE COURT
David O. Boehm, J.
By order dated August 9, 1990, this court confirmed the Referee’s report of sale, and awarded the Referee, Lawrence Kalik, compensation of $25,000, plus disbursements, for his services in this partition action.
The plaintiff, James A. Hufnagle, now moves for leave to reargue the order, claiming that the compensation fixed is in excess of the statutory authority for Referee’s compensation. Kalik cross-moves for an order amending, nunc pro tunc, the June 6, 1988, order of reference to provide that his compensation be based on the value of the services…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Chisholm v. HopsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Scher v. AptAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- O'Dwyer v. RobsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Major Capital Corp. v. 4487 Third Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.