Legal Opinion
In re Shinn
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 22, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Clifton C. Shinn. On rule to show cause why a sale of property seized in attachment proceedings against the bankrupt should not be enjoined.
1Opinion of the Court
RELLSTAB, District Judge.
The Petitioner, Rlwin A. Mumford, is the trustee appointed in the bankruptcy proceedings instituted by Clifton C. Shinn in the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Shinn in 1906 was a resident and freeholder of this state. On the 23d day of June, 1906, he conveyed his property for the benefit of his creditors, to Isaac Bacharach, trustee. The deed conveying his real estate, at the close of the description, contains the following clause:
“In trust, nevertheless, to the said party of the second part to sell, convey or otherwise…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yeatman v. Savings InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reed v. McIntyreSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- In re BurkaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1900
- Goddard v. WeaverU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Galbraith v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1925
- In re BridgeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
- Jones v. FieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Bertenshaw v. KoenekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924