Legal Opinion

Jones v. Fiesel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1939No. 31,693PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff sues to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from defendant’s negligence in causing a collision on June 5, 1932, between his automobile and that of one A. E. Cole, in which she was riding as a passenger. By supplemental answer defendant set up as a separate defense that after the action was commenced he was duly adjudged a bankrupt on June 24, 1936, under the acts of congress relating to bankruptcy; that plaintiff’s claim for damages was duly scheduled in the bankruptcy proceeding as a provable debt; that plaintiff was given due notice; and that on March…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Sexton v. DreyfusSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Lewis v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minnesota Wood Specialties, Inc. v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Opinion No. 68-185 (1969) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API