Legal Opinion

American Fork City v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 23, 2011No. 20100736-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

T1 David M. Smith appeals from his conviction of electronic communication harassment, a class B misdemeanor. Smith asserts various constitutional issues to challenge his conviction. We affirm.

T2 Smith first asserts that Utah Code section 76-9-201 is unconstitutional because it is overbroad and vague, and therefore violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Although Smith argued to the jury that his vile speech directed at his ex-wife was protected under the First Amendment, he did not raise a challenge to the constitutionality of the statute before the trial…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. O'DEA v. OleaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. JaegerUtah Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Gary Lunsford (075691)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. State v. Gary Lunsford (075691)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API