State v. Frazier.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.
Defendant was charged by information with violating the prohibition law. The information was in three counts: The first count charged defendant with having in his possession “a certain doubler, worm, fermenting tub, mash tub and still.” The second count charged the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Defendant was acquitted on the second and third counts and convicted on the first count. The appeal is from that conviction.
The error complained of relates to the instruction for the State which told the jury that if they should find that defendant had in his possession “a certain doubler, worm,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Caenefielt v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
- City of Mexico v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LoweryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. CitiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- State of Missouri v. MoonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
- State v. McCowanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932