Legal Opinion

State v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 23, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGBEE, C.

The first count of the information charges that the defendant, on November 5, 1921, had in his possession one still, doubler, worm, worm-tub, mash tub and fermenting tub, used and fit for use in the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, the possession of said still, doubler, worm, worm-tub, mash tub and fermenting tub being then and there unlawful and prohibited, etc., following the language of Section 6588-, Revised -Statutes 1919, as amended (Laws 1921, p. 414). The second count charges the defendant with selling intoxicating liquors contrary to the form of the statute, etc. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. OertelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Balch v. FrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HefflinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State v. FenleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. State v. SalernitanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. State v. Frazier.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API