Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. Moon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

Defendant Parker together with one M.oon were jointly tried and convicted of having a still fit for use in the distilling of intoxicating liquor, contrary to section 2 of the Act of April 3, 1923, concerning intoxicating liquors. [See Laws of 1923, p. 237.] The punishment assessed by the verdict of the jury was .a fine of $100 and thirty days in the county jail. Defendant Parker has appealed.

The facts show that on March 10, 1924, some officers of Buchanan county, armed with a search warrant, raided a place just south of the city limits of St. Joseph. When they arrived at said place they found…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. State v. SpillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HiblerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. State v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. State v. BallardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. State v. CitiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Pueblo v. RamosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API