Legal Opinion
Perez v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 24, 2001No. Civ.S-99-2000FCDDADPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAMRELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Perez brings this diversity action alleging that his former employer Proctor and Gamble Manufacturing Company (“P & G”) discriminated against him on account of his mental disability in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal.Gov.Code § 12940(k), and constructively discharged him in violation of public policy. This matter is before the court on P & G’s motion for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons set forth below, P & G’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
1. Plaintiff’s Employment
Plaintiff John Perez…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Diaz v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Velente-Hook v. Eastern Plumas Health CareDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- Kailikole v. Palomar Cmty. Coll. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Nelson v. Foster Poultry FarmsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Perez v. Foster Poultry FarmsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.