Legal Opinion
United Engineering Co. v. Pillsbury
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 10, 1950No. Nos. 28735, 28810, 29058, 29292PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
In these four consolidated actions, the plaintiff employers and their respective insurance carriers have asked this court to set aside and enjoin the enforcement of Compensation Orders and Awards made by the Deputy Commissioner pursuant to the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S. C.A. §§ 901-950. The question presented is whether the Deputy Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to make the awards because the claims for compensation were not filed within a year after the claimants were injured as is allegedly required by Section 13(a)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Stancil v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Trzoniec v. General Controls Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
- Stancil v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Denis B. O'keeffe, as Deputy Commissioner, Second Compensation District, Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.