Hamil v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY. J.
This action was commenced before a justice of the peace of Kingfisher county by defendants in error, herein referred to as plaintiffs, against plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant. Plaintiffs claimed .$51, alleged to be due for work and labor, and $25 for alleged conversion of a duofold.
Judgment was for plaintiffs in justice court, and defendant appealed to the district court, where the cause was tried to a jury resulting in a verdict and judgment in that court in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $62.
Defendant appeals to this court by pttition in error and case-made.
Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Local Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hudson-Houston Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Seidenbach's, Inc. v. MuddimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Bilby v. AnglinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estes v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Industrial Building & Loan Ass'n v. AshlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939