Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Relmar Holding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 7, 1932No. 203PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
These motions are made upon two petitions for a writ of prohibition forbidding the Circuit Judge, designated under section 22 of title 28, USCA, to hear the suit of American Brake Shoo Company v. Intorborough Rapid Transit Company; and the District Court, to entertain it. They pray incidentally a mandamus requiring the court to dismiss the bill. One petition is made by a note holder of the Iulerborough Rapid Transit Company; the other, by the Manhattan Railway Company (whose control had passed into new hands), a committee of its shareholders, one individual shareholder,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Michigan v. Michigan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Kingsport Press, Inc. v. Brief English Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- May Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Paramount-Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934