Iandoli v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 15, 1976, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating the second cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Both the first and third causes of action sound in breach of a contract for sale and are governed by a four-year Statute of Limitations (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-725). Plaintiffs argument in avoidance of this limitation that these causes are based in economic duress which is a species of fraud and,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Morrison v. National Broadcasting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Carr v. LipshieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Carr v. LipshieNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Friedman v. Roseth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Belsky v. LowenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Matana v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Powers Mercantile Corp. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Apex Oil Company v. Vanguard Oil & Service Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Lieb v. American Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.