Legal Opinion

Lieb v. American Motors Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 1, 1982No. 81 Civ. 1004 (RLC)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

This is an action alleging safety and design defects in the American Motors Jeep, model CJ-5, and fraud in the marketing of that vehicle. Defendants, American Motors Corporation (“AM”) and Jeep Corporation (“Jeep”), move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and for failure to satisfy jurisdictional prerequisites. Plaintiff, Richard Lieb, opposes the motion and seeks to amend his complaint to strike one cause of action, to add another cause of action and a third defendant, and to modify the amount in controversy.

In July, 1977,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pyskaty v. Wide World of Cars, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Saval v. BL Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. T & E INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Safety Light Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  4. Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. Saval v. Bl Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API