Legal Opinion

Powers Mercantile Corp. v. Feinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1985PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sullivan, J.

From 1962 until January 31, 1973, plaintiff’s predecessor, CITC Industries, Inc., a New York corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of footwear, employed William Manowitz who, by virtue of various managerial positions he held, was able to acquire confidential information concerning CITC’s business. According to plaintiff, during the latter part of 1972 and through January 31, 1973, Manowitz entered into a conspiracy with Maurice and Frank Feinberg to conceal a multimillion dollar order from Roller Derby, a major customer of CITC, and divert it to Manow…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Twersky v. Yeshiva UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Matana v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API