Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ford Motor Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1963No. 9807PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

Personal injury action. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant, Ford Motor Company, and against the plaintiff, no cause of action, for the reason that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff, on this appeal, contends the lower court erred because there existed genuine issues of fact as to his negligence and, if any, whether or not it was the proximate cause of the accident.

We find ourselves unable to determine this appeal upon its merits. The depositions of the plaintiff and two other persons were taken (upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reliable Furniture Co. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rosander v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lowe v. Sorenson Research Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Pratt Ex Rel. Pratt v. Mitchell Hollow Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Carter v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bawden & Associates v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API