Legal Opinion

Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. Chaz Waltman and Mississippi Fence, LLC

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided September 15, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00091Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL PLAINTIFF SERVICES CORPORATION v. CAUSE NO. 1:26CV91-LG-RPM CHAZ WALTMAN AND DEFENDANTS MISSISSIPPI FENCE, LLC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S [11] MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation’s (“Cat Financial”) Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Chaz Waltman and Mississippi Fence, LLC (“Mississippi Fence”). For the following reasons, the Court grants Cat Financial’s motion. BACKGROUND Waltman and Mississippi Fence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Eddie Wooten v. McDonald Transit Assoc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. Sun Bank of Ocala v. Pelican Homestead and Savings Association, and Third Party v. American First Mortgage Funding Corp., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. James v. FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Rogers v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API