Legal Opinion

Kloosterman v. Kalamazoo City Lines, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1971No. 3 October Term 1971, Docket No. 52,784PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. G. Kavanagh, J.

The pertinent facts of the case at bar were found by the Court of Appeals to be as follows:

“Larry Schaftenaar, a bus driver for the defendant company, was operating one of the defendant’s buses when it struck plaintiff’s truck in the rear. Schaftenaar pled guilty in the Kalamazoo municipal court to the charge of failing to exercise due care. Plaintiff did not join Schaftenaar as a party defendant but sued the defendant on the theory of negligent entrustment.
“Before the trial plaintiff took Schaftenaar’s deposition and during the questioning elicited from him that he had pled guilty to failing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Cebulak v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Zimmerman v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Van Goosen v. BarlumMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Elliotte v. LavierMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. EylMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Adama v. Doehler-Jarvis, Division of N L Industries, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Fredericks v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Fredericks v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Wheelock v. EylMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API