Legal Opinion

Van Goosen v. Barlum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1921No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Wayne; Marschner (Adolph F.), J. Case by Henry Van Goosen against Lewis T. Barium for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

While plaintiff was attempting to cross on foot from the east side of Woodward avenue to the west side at Sproat street in the city of Detroit *597he claims he was run into by defendant’s automobile, thrown to the pavement and seriously injured. It is the claim of plaintiff that at the moment he was struck he was standing between the rails of the west track on Woodward avenue looking westward waiting for some south-bound automobiles to pass; that defendant was traveling, north on the east side of Woodward avenue; that before reaching him he swerved his automobile to the west for some purpose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Leland v. KauthMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. La LondeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lunde v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Pratt v. WickhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sting v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Zimmerman v. GoldbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API