Legal Opinion

Saathoff v. Kuhlman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2009No. 24861, 24869PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] Larry Saathoff sued Myron Kuhlman for defamation and intentional *802infliction of emotional distress based on the implications of a letter to the editor authored by Kuhlman and published in area newspapers. Kuhlman sued Saathoff, Sandra Larson, and Lance Noem for defamation based on three allegations set forth in a petition they circulated. The circuit court granted summary judgment in both suits finding, in part, that the statements were true, or at least half-truths. Saathoff appealed. Kuhlman filed a notice of review, preserving his appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dowling Family Partnership v. Midland Farms, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hass v. WentzlaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Peters v. Great Western Bank, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Gades v. Meyer Modernizing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Karst v. Shur-Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API