State ex rel. Montgomery v. Woodburn
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 This special action asks whether the trial court can place a defendant on probation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (West 2012) (“Proposition 200”), after he pled guilty to “attempt to obtain or procure the administration of a narcotic drug by fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or subterfuge.” A.R.S. §§ 13-1001, -3401, -3408, -3418, -701, -702, and -801. Because we find that Proposition 200 does not apply to the offense, we accept special action jurisdiction and grant relief.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Denis Donald Schmeissing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018