Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Montgomery v. Woodburn

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 6, 2012No. 1 CA-SA 12-0205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 This special action asks whether the trial court can place a defendant on probation pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-901.01 (West 2012) (“Proposition 200”), after he pled guilty to “attempt to obtain or procure the administration of a narcotic drug by fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or subterfuge.” A.R.S. §§ 13-1001, -3401, -3408, -3418, -701, -702, and -801. Because we find that Proposition 200 does not apply to the offense, we accept special action jurisdiction and grant relief.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Denis Donald Schmeissing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API